大学生比中学生难成为百万富翁！！！
父母每天对你说：“你要好好读书，将来做个有用的人。”这句话是对的
父母每天对你说：“你要好好读书，将来做个有钱的人。”这句话是错的
做工可以成为百万富翁吗？请你拿计算机按一按，即使你不吃不穿不喝不玩不乐不赌不嫖不烟不酒，还要每个月存下RM5000，存足16.67年，你才有一百万，到时钱都贬值了！一百万都不知省多少咯！
工字不出头是对的！
要富有，生意和投资是不可少的！
我问过很多大学朋友，你有想过成为百万富翁吗？
这没礼貌的王八蛋大声地顶我，有谁不想成为百万富翁哦！
没关系，我再问要怎样才可以做到啊？
他还顶我，老子有方法就自己去做啦！还需要留在大学吗？
那你留在大学干什么啊？
妈妈说：“要努力读书，拿好成绩，找份好工作就可以赚到钱啦！”
你们是不是一样的想法？
你妈妈那时候是用书来上学的啊！
你今天是用电脑来上课的啊！
你妈妈以前一分钱买一串杀爹！
今天一分钱连杀爹的棍都买不到啊！
好啦！先回来主题！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！
我先拿他们两个来做比喻
先中学生(A)吧：—
A是位中三都没毕业的学生，他的知识只是会数学，华语，少许国语，不会英语的情况来出来打拚，全世界都说这位年轻人惨啦！什么都不会，以后怎样啊？？？
当他15岁时，到一家玻璃工厂做工，刚开始只是区区的六百零吉。
慢慢的慢慢的他开始在工厂学这些手艺，18岁时就忍受不了工钱低的苦，开始换到别处做工！以下是他的收入，开销与储蓄。
15岁 工钱RM600 开销RM600
16岁 工钱RM1000 开销RM700 储蓄RM300
17岁 工钱RM1300 开销RM900 储蓄RM400
18岁换地方上班，老板赏识
18岁 工钱RM2000 开销RM1000 储蓄RM1000
19岁 工钱RM2500 开销RM1000 储蓄RM1700
20岁 工钱RM2700 开销RM1000 储蓄RM1700
21岁 工钱RM2700 开销RM1000 储蓄RM1700
22岁 工钱RM2700 开销RM1000 储蓄RM1700
23岁 工钱RM2700 开销RM1000 储蓄RM1700
假设这A跟你们大学生一样没什么不良嗜好，没什么娱乐，也没女朋友，只需给妈妈零用和供车而已！
他的储蓄在短短的八年就可以有过RM100000储蓄去做生意！
23岁的他有自己的事业，生意人脉，生意经验，社会学业，工作经验！
再来看看我们呢？大学生的生涯！
23岁的你，什么都没有，
只有A4纸一张，一套穿过一次的‘衣服’，戴过一顶少许人可以戴到的四方帽！
但你没本钱，没人脉，没经验！
你只可以跟人家打工！
23岁的你跟A相差极远！
没关系，有些大学生不肯认输，他们说；‘我们有知识，肯定爬快过他们的！’
我心想；‘爬，那么容易，爬墙壁爬山就厉害啦！’
我们再来说下23岁过后的事！
先来中学生吧！
23岁后，他可能是一位和出名的企业家但也有可能是一位桥底家（乞丐），即使他失败，他也可以跟我们一样重新开始，但他没有的是钱和事业，而他还有人脉，经验可以帮助他东山再起！
而大学生呢？
23 岁后的你，一张通往你个人认为是天堂的通行证，进入一间大公司开始工作。每个月RM2000的‘储蓄’。到26岁时的你，有了RM96000，但我敢有 99%的肯定你有99.5%不敢或不想去做生意！26岁的你应了解到身边的朋友应嫁的嫁了，应娶的娶了！而这时候的你不管三七二十一，先来一辆房车，再来 一张卡，和来一间屋子。因为现实的社会里，先要有面包才有爱情，虽然很多人说，有情喝水饱，你可以叫他们两喝够两个月的水，不水肿我都不信哦！
没关系，更有些大学生还还不肯认输，他们说夫妻同心，其利断金！说的也对，两夫妻的工钱肯定足够啦！真对不起，华人结婚是很贵的，嫁妆，酒席，礼品，宴会统统至少过RM50000。
再没关系，更有些大学生还还还还不肯认输，我们还有父母帮忙的，我父母有钱啊!以上只是到结婚那阶段哦！你们的结晶品要出来咯！牛奶，尿片，教育，保险，车，屋，女佣，水电呢呢呢呢呢？
即使上面的问题都不是你的问题了！而你大学生到现在还有RM50，000存款，你敢去做生意和投资，请问下你敢吗？？？？？？？
你做生意一旦失败，又没有稳定的收入，没有稳定的工作，你的孩子谁养啊？
教育，保险，车，屋，女佣，水电谁来付啊！
你不信的话，回家跟你爸商量商量，或问问看他的意见，问看他会不会出来闯？？？？
你爸肯定说，五十千不会留着防身吗？
为什么中学学历的年轻人可以做到？而你们做不到，因为他们的本钱是时间，跌倒再起来跌倒再起来！！！！！他对自己说“人生有多少个十年”
大学生呢？你也有，但在大学！"enjoy university life"
最后，我想大学生可以用心想一想，现在你做的是对还是错！别走错方向！
*************提醒**************
以上写的都是小弟毕生经验的理财之道，万万与任何直销，行销无关！
如果以上你觉得有道理的，而你勉强可以接受的，你就帮帮忙click一次like!
如果以上你觉得很满意的，而你又非常赞同的，你就帮帮忙click一次like，再share给你的朋友分享分享咯！
如果以上你觉得和反对的，而你又很多意见的，麻烦你comment comment一下，给我这无知的学生清醒清醒！
Friday, April 1, 2011
Sunday, March 20, 2011
The 4 A's of Advertising
Attention, Awareness, Attitude, Action= AIDA Attention Interest Desire Action
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Is CGPA an appropiate scale to meaure a person talent?
One of my core team member, Chin tell me his view on the academic performance few days ago when i tell him my latest business idea.
Chin: You are near to exam but yet still thinking about business.
Me: Yea, why? Is not a bad things what. As long as i can pass is ok for me. No need to get too high for the CGPA, i am not study to be employee, but to be employer. (very lanc is it?) And i wont measure my employee just on the CGPA alone. A good one not necessary with good CGPA.
Chin (not agree face): UHmm~If a person cant even manage one own-selves good, how are he/she going to manage others. (quite true)
Me: Yea, quite true. But i cant do well because i am not interested in study for exam, but if you ask me to study for my own interest to become a millionaire, i can study well.
Chin: uhmm
Me: uhmm
Well, whats the point here?
There are 2 main view point actually, no false or right.
One is the thinking of ordinary manager thinking, an also implement by mostly all the managers. Managers always judge people based on their CGPA, because they simply believe that a poor CGPA means that you can't manage yourself well. They not judging the CGPA as how good you memorize, is how good you manage yourself. Actually is quite true also, some body just hanging around and never plan what he or she want to do for future of course he or she wont plan for a good CGPA. In this paragraph, what i can say for the managers is, yes, you have hired a good worker for the company, he or she will do well in every task you give to him or her. But, the self motivated level is low, they will feel tired and slow down one day, when the return is not satisfying them. What you need to give out is actually higher compare to what you will gain back.
The above is explaining and example a few ordinary view point of many managers. Now come to my point of view, i agree on a good CGPA holder are good in planning, and organizing themselves. Lets compare a person with high CGPA and a guy with moderate CGPA. The high one good in managing themselves, they study for their future(being employed and get high salary), another one is because he study for the needs of wanting to excel and creating something new. Which one you will hire? 95% of the managers will hire the 1st one, but i will hire the 2nd one. I will say that the ROI (return on investment) is higher. Invest a bit, but return is higher, with the condition that he like what he is doing.
Just visualize it: If i hired an architect with good result, what he aspect? a high salary, then i need to pay him for at least RM2k++. Another one, with medium range result, but he like to try something out of the box, something new, with only RM1.5k. The 1st one always follow what i ask him to do, but the 2nd one always surprise me with something might be a very new idea which might become a very famous things in future.
So is all about you choose a follower or an innovator. Low risk low return, high risk high return.
Chin: You are near to exam but yet still thinking about business.
Me: Yea, why? Is not a bad things what. As long as i can pass is ok for me. No need to get too high for the CGPA, i am not study to be employee, but to be employer. (very lanc is it?) And i wont measure my employee just on the CGPA alone. A good one not necessary with good CGPA.
Chin (not agree face): UHmm~If a person cant even manage one own-selves good, how are he/she going to manage others. (quite true)
Me: Yea, quite true. But i cant do well because i am not interested in study for exam, but if you ask me to study for my own interest to become a millionaire, i can study well.
Chin: uhmm
Me: uhmm
Well, whats the point here?
There are 2 main view point actually, no false or right.
One is the thinking of ordinary manager thinking, an also implement by mostly all the managers. Managers always judge people based on their CGPA, because they simply believe that a poor CGPA means that you can't manage yourself well. They not judging the CGPA as how good you memorize, is how good you manage yourself. Actually is quite true also, some body just hanging around and never plan what he or she want to do for future of course he or she wont plan for a good CGPA. In this paragraph, what i can say for the managers is, yes, you have hired a good worker for the company, he or she will do well in every task you give to him or her. But, the self motivated level is low, they will feel tired and slow down one day, when the return is not satisfying them. What you need to give out is actually higher compare to what you will gain back.
The above is explaining and example a few ordinary view point of many managers. Now come to my point of view, i agree on a good CGPA holder are good in planning, and organizing themselves. Lets compare a person with high CGPA and a guy with moderate CGPA. The high one good in managing themselves, they study for their future(being employed and get high salary), another one is because he study for the needs of wanting to excel and creating something new. Which one you will hire? 95% of the managers will hire the 1st one, but i will hire the 2nd one. I will say that the ROI (return on investment) is higher. Invest a bit, but return is higher, with the condition that he like what he is doing.
Just visualize it: If i hired an architect with good result, what he aspect? a high salary, then i need to pay him for at least RM2k++. Another one, with medium range result, but he like to try something out of the box, something new, with only RM1.5k. The 1st one always follow what i ask him to do, but the 2nd one always surprise me with something might be a very new idea which might become a very famous things in future.
So is all about you choose a follower or an innovator. Low risk low return, high risk high return.
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
You are Not Kottler or Armstrong!
My tutor say something very interesting today when one group of the students answer the tutorial question without carefully follow what is in the lecture slides. Ms Gengeswari, my beloved Retail management tutor and lecturer as well said: you are not Kottler or Armstrong, don't develop your own theory, follow what the point written in the lecture slides! lol...I smile at the time she said this. I am not saying she is wrong, please don't get me wrong. She is doing what she is being. She is a tutor, she want us to pass, so she have to teach in this way, and ask you to follow what in the slides, actually indirectly she is asking us to answer in a way that will score in the exam. And it is good for Malaysia student (only). We can only blame what poor education system, which judge us on whether we follow the marking scheme or not.
Well, what actually i want to say here is, everyone is natural born to be someone. You are who you are. I am not Kottler or Armstrong, but i am Edison Teo, and i am proud of myself. Why Kottler and Armstrong are so good? Why everyone follow their theory? Because they a very good of themselves. They do their best in their own way. We can and everyone can develop their own theory and be followed as well, just make sure you do your best. If you are a chef, cook your best, and everyone will eat what you cook. If you are an artist, then draw your best, you be someone someday somehow.
But the phenomena nowadays is, a lots of human being let go of themselves. They say no to themselves, not other say no to them. Just imagine, how are you going to persuades others to hire you or buy your idea if you don't have any self confident? To be followed, to be hire, to sell your idea, to sell yourself, 1st of all, the basic requirement, do your very best on being the positive site of yourself. Please don't abuse my words, i am not asking you to be a theft if you are good in stealing! Don't do illegal act, make sure are always in your very healthy personality. And do your very best, trust me, you are someone in future, not necessary be the president of United States, but at least you are the one make your mom and you dad proud off, you are your children' hero.
I am not Kottler or Armstrong, i am me myself! Build your confident from inside.
Well, what actually i want to say here is, everyone is natural born to be someone. You are who you are. I am not Kottler or Armstrong, but i am Edison Teo, and i am proud of myself. Why Kottler and Armstrong are so good? Why everyone follow their theory? Because they a very good of themselves. They do their best in their own way. We can and everyone can develop their own theory and be followed as well, just make sure you do your best. If you are a chef, cook your best, and everyone will eat what you cook. If you are an artist, then draw your best, you be someone someday somehow.
But the phenomena nowadays is, a lots of human being let go of themselves. They say no to themselves, not other say no to them. Just imagine, how are you going to persuades others to hire you or buy your idea if you don't have any self confident? To be followed, to be hire, to sell your idea, to sell yourself, 1st of all, the basic requirement, do your very best on being the positive site of yourself. Please don't abuse my words, i am not asking you to be a theft if you are good in stealing! Don't do illegal act, make sure are always in your very healthy personality. And do your very best, trust me, you are someone in future, not necessary be the president of United States, but at least you are the one make your mom and you dad proud off, you are your children' hero.
I am not Kottler or Armstrong, i am me myself! Build your confident from inside.
Sunday, February 20, 2011
Infatuation? Satisfaction?
There are no service or product in this world will fully and continuously satisfy consumer. You might say Dell is the best, or i love Iphone 4, but trust me, you will complaint for the small speaker of Dell computer and the easy cracked screen of the Iphone 4 someday somehow.
I think you are quite blur in this point, what the difference between infatuation and satisfaction? Infatuation is you are admire to something that can brought you to loving the products or services by focus on the GOOD of the product but ignore the BAD of the product. In the other word, we can say that the Good site of the product have grab all your attention, you don't really mind if the Iphone screen will easily broken when dropped, you just simply like the user friendly user interface design and the apps in it. Infatuation is beyond satisfaction in this case.
So infatuation is good or bad for business, especially in new launch product. In my opinion there are both pros and cons. The pros are we can make use of infatuation. A product that can grab the consumer attention crazily is good for it's sale and revenue. Iphone 4 sell off crazily due to the infatuation on the innovation of apple products, there are fans of apple products instead of consumers. They will buy ipod and macbooks too, not only iphone. When a product in this stage, it bring benefits to all its other product.
But however, we can't ignore the cons part. When everyone discover the products "dark side", the very interested situation will turned dramatically to the worst. We might just take Edison Chan scandal case as the example. (Celebrity actually are a form of products too) Everyone love and like the good looking of Edison Chan, he have lots of fans following him, supporting him. But when the sex scandals case come to the surface of the water. His image turn down straight, supporter become criticism, fans turned to hatter. Same-things happen to products too, if Iphone is proven will cause cancer to user, will you use it again? No is the answer, the worst case is, you will ask your friends not to use it too.
Creating the infatuation to products need extra care on the potential risk. But i still will say that it will bring out a very impressive result if you can handle it well. =)
I think you are quite blur in this point, what the difference between infatuation and satisfaction? Infatuation is you are admire to something that can brought you to loving the products or services by focus on the GOOD of the product but ignore the BAD of the product. In the other word, we can say that the Good site of the product have grab all your attention, you don't really mind if the Iphone screen will easily broken when dropped, you just simply like the user friendly user interface design and the apps in it. Infatuation is beyond satisfaction in this case.
So infatuation is good or bad for business, especially in new launch product. In my opinion there are both pros and cons. The pros are we can make use of infatuation. A product that can grab the consumer attention crazily is good for it's sale and revenue. Iphone 4 sell off crazily due to the infatuation on the innovation of apple products, there are fans of apple products instead of consumers. They will buy ipod and macbooks too, not only iphone. When a product in this stage, it bring benefits to all its other product.
But however, we can't ignore the cons part. When everyone discover the products "dark side", the very interested situation will turned dramatically to the worst. We might just take Edison Chan scandal case as the example. (Celebrity actually are a form of products too) Everyone love and like the good looking of Edison Chan, he have lots of fans following him, supporting him. But when the sex scandals case come to the surface of the water. His image turn down straight, supporter become criticism, fans turned to hatter. Same-things happen to products too, if Iphone is proven will cause cancer to user, will you use it again? No is the answer, the worst case is, you will ask your friends not to use it too.
Creating the infatuation to products need extra care on the potential risk. But i still will say that it will bring out a very impressive result if you can handle it well. =)
Saturday, January 1, 2011
Happy New Year 2011
Well, let me design my post to be very straight to point and easy to read, and easy to understand.
Vision for 2011
Transform from a student life to entrepreneur life style.
Mission statement
In terms of health, will tends to live a healthier lifestyle, so good bye to high cholesterol foods and high sugar drinks. Sleep early and wake up early.
In terms of study, remain a level to pass, that's enough for me, because i use to hire people more than being hired. Well prepare myself before going to lecture and tutorial, 0 skip class.
In terms of career, collaborate with yourpcshop.com, hope it does an income for me.
In terms of business, focus on 2 start-ups. Online bus ticketing and also one to be chose from my list of business idea. Complete the business plan.
In terms of networks, start to expand it more to real world business network rather than social network.
In terms of family, will show more care for them.
In terms of relationship, this beyond my control, but hope that is someone that will assist me lots in my career and business.
Vision for 2011
Transform from a student life to entrepreneur life style.
Mission statement
In terms of health, will tends to live a healthier lifestyle, so good bye to high cholesterol foods and high sugar drinks. Sleep early and wake up early.
In terms of study, remain a level to pass, that's enough for me, because i use to hire people more than being hired. Well prepare myself before going to lecture and tutorial, 0 skip class.
In terms of career, collaborate with yourpcshop.com, hope it does an income for me.
In terms of business, focus on 2 start-ups. Online bus ticketing and also one to be chose from my list of business idea. Complete the business plan.
In terms of networks, start to expand it more to real world business network rather than social network.
In terms of family, will show more care for them.
In terms of relationship, this beyond my control, but hope that is someone that will assist me lots in my career and business.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)